wholookshere

the solution isn’t to lie down in defeat. its boycott.

citation needed

Ah yes, if anyone is against AI, because of its problems, then we’ve all lost our minds.

Ahh yes, how dare a community run and funded project have community accountability.

The project has several ways of being community funded.

do not feed the troll

because why else make changes to something not broken? I haven’t heard any big cases for locking down side loading.

broader context, google is slowly killing ASOP. they’re slowly closing its source, changing what made android great to a lot of people. They’ve started by only releasing source code on release.

on another note to other readers.

this reaks of astortufing. new account, and heavy belief in the good of corporations.

also

its a corp it can’t just make claims and not follow on them.

counter point. Apple in the announcement said that iMesaage would be an open platform. where did that go?

they can and do lie. all the fucking time

Totally on that page with you.

But there’s a lot of people who will come say that, but only comment on China related calls, which reaks of “all lives matter” level of disingenuous.

I’ll bite.

How often do you comment that on non Chinese cars?

A lot of ads also run on conversion. Some and networks don’t charge right away until a user converts.

Thank you for coming with more sources.

What do you think an intentional leak is?

No your point is that your trying to be the loudest voice.

All you have are insults instead of anything of substance.

Have the day you deserve.

The last section specifically calls out an apple example

Provoking, the fourth type of leak, involves companies leaking truthful information in the hopes of obtaining useful information. In “How Apple Does Controlled Leaks” John Martellaro suggests that before launching the iPad, Apple may have released tablet information early for several reasons including wanting to gauge reaction to a US$1,000 price point; to panic or confuse competitors; or to whet analyst expectations. Hannah et al. caution that provoking could backfire if affected parties act on information they assume to be final but that subsequently turns out not to be, negatively affecting a company’s reputation.

Source in article

https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/the-art-of-deliberately-leaking-corporate-secrets_b_8743858

No, it starts months before with teases and leaks.

Also like, you agree you knew what was in the envelope, you think that was an accident?

Do you have something to say there wasn’t planning? Because that’s your claim with 0 evidence, which beats their something.

Okay, but can you see how that’s not actually what you said?

You just called it stupid.

But with hindsight, do you think that carrier deployment unrelated?

Because if it is, then some planning went into it.

do you really think marketing starts at a launch? people have to know what’s going to be announced to be excited to watch.

of course leaks are a part of that.

what? not them but they did add a source as early as January 29th.

I’m lost, how is that redefining stupid?

Not really no. It doesn’t build hype.