

Fighting for which empire was worse is pointless. The actually important thing is that people readsettlers.org .


Fighting for which empire was worse is pointless. The actually important thing is that people readsettlers.org .


GUIX top left
nixOS top right
Edit: Ah I missed the axes are not labeled like the common political compass. Nvm then. Put NixOS above RHEL and guix above arch.


you are posting here in a very very western context. Words like “goyim”, and “jews did 9/11” are used by people who still cheer for the big genocide by genocidesmany where every third victim was jewish, so people will automatically jump to conclusions based on that. You can’t be mad at people for thinking you’re alt-right if you sound like them. Talks like a duck and all that.
What exactly about my statement suggests I’m a 4chan user?
Your confusion of judaism with zionism. You seem to think I’m on board with the palestinian genocide, but I’m not.
But do you think the pissrahelli bombs make a distinction between Iranian/Palestinian Jews or gentiles?

But replace gay with “jew”.
The “Jews” didn’t do 9/11. The Judeochristian capitalist elite did and until you can properly identify your enemy you will not make any progress toward defeating it. You can bomb tel aviv all you want (if you need help I’d be happy to get to be able to do something) but the capitalists will then find just find another mask to put on to continue the slaughter if you don’t see it through all the way to Washington DC.
This is the thing with far-left or far-right extremists they’ll always wrongfully assume moderates are the extremists because of course no one considers THEMSELVES extremist,
Of course I consider myself extremist. Relative to the current political climate yeah, I’m a radical extremist.


Here is a good study guide for the basics: https://lemmy.ml/post/43309494


oh not at all, it’s an easy mistake to make when someone isn’t versed in communist terminology.


No, you got the wrong message “Bourgeois society” is a society that has the “proletarian <-> bourgeois” contradiction, not “the society of the bourgeoisie”.
The bourgeoisie don’t have the option to decide. They have to go with barbarism or there won’t be a bourgeoisie anymore. They cannot choose socialism ever, it’s scientifically impossible. They’d have to become class traitors first. Commit class suicide. Only then, when they are no longer bourgeoisie can they choose. Here is great excerpt of “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific” by Engels that talks about Robert Owen who experienced this first hand (and who eventually committed class suicide very much to his credit) https://www.marxists.org/glossary/people/o/w.htm#owen


Friedrich Engels once said: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” What does “regression into barbarism” mean to our lofty European civilization? Until now, we have all probably read and repeated these words thoughtlessly, without suspecting their fearsome seriousness. A look around us at this moment shows what the regression of bourgeois society into barbarism means. This world war is a regression into barbarism. The triumph of imperialism leads to the annihilation of civilization. At first, this happens sporadically for the duration of a modern war, but then when the period of unlimited wars begins it progresses toward its inevitable consequences. Today, we face the choice exactly as Friedrich Engels foresaw it a generation ago: either the triumph of imperialism and the collapse of all civilization as in ancient Rome, depopulation, desolation, degeneration – a great cemetery. Or the victory of socialism, that means the conscious active struggle of the international proletariat against imperialism and its method of war. This is a dilemma of world history, an either/or; the scales are wavering before the decision of the class-conscious proletariat. The future of civilization and humanity depends on whether or not the proletariat resolves manfully to throw its revolutionary broadsword into the scales. In this war imperialism has won. Its bloody sword of genocide has brutally tilted the scale toward the abyss of misery. The only compensation for all the misery and all the shame would be if we learn from the war how the proletariat can seize mastery of its own destiny and escape the role of the lackey to the ruling classes.
This was Rosa Luxemburg in 1915. The regression into barbarism was brutal. Lets not lose sight of “the only compensation for the misery and all the shame”
what 4


goes on communist website
built by communists that got kicked out of reddit
i like this, but what about all those communists???



100% that person is from 4chan lmfao how arent they banned yet .world moderation is abysmal


haha fuck outta here channer


definitely!


fasc shitshow unfortunately


GUIX GUIX GUIX


I guess my main question would be… If the Soviet Union was truly raising thinking, critical workers that would one day not become slaves, then how is it possible that immediately after its collapse, Russia became almost immediately a fascist state that indeed allowed only slaves and never masters to exist beyond its oligarchy?
The soviet union was an absolute academic powerhouse, for instance they won every space-race except the first walk on the moon. Women were particularly empowered this video essay is really really good https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnTlejH-WzQ
The collapse of the USSR was a betrayal from the top orchestrated with western companies that gutted the former socialist republics. Women with PhD’s were suddenly not being hired anymore and many were forced into sex work in order to survive. They even held a referendum in the months prior to legitimize the dissolution but the vast majority of the population voted in favor of keeping communism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Soviet_Union_referendum .


Den russischen Kommunismus mit dem Nazi-Faschismus auf die gleiche moralische Stufe zu stellen, weil beide totalitär seien, ist besten Falles Oberflächlichkeit, im schlimmeren Falle ist es - Faschismus. Wer auf dieser Gleichstellung beharrt, mag sich als Demokrat vorkommen, -in Wahrheit und im Herzensgrund ist er damit bereits Faschist und wird mit Sicherheit den Faschismus nur unaufrichtig und zum Schein, mit vollem Haß aber allein den Kommunismus bekämpfen.
Die Unterschiede im Verhältnis des russischen Sozialismus und des Faschismus zur Humanität, zur Idee des Menschen und seiner Zukunft sind unermeßlich. Der unteilbare Friede; konstruktive Arbeit und gerechter Lohn; ein allgemeiner Genuß der Güter dieser Erde; mehr Glück, weniger vermeidbares und nur vom Menschen verschuldetes Leid hienieden; die geistige Hebung des Volkes durch Erziehung, durch Wissen, durch Bildung - das alles sind Ziele, die denjenigen faschistischer Misanthropie, faschistischen Nihilismus, faschistischer Erniedrigungslust und Verdummungspädagogik diametral entgegengesetzt sind. Der Kommunismus, wie die russische Revolution ihn unter besonderen menschlichen Gegebenheiten zu verwirklichen sucht, ist, trotz aller blutigen Zeichen, die daran irre machen könnten, im Kern — und sehr im Gegensatz zum Faschismus — eine humanitäre und eine demokratische Bewegung. Tyrannei? Er ist es. Aber eine Tyrannei, die das Analphabetentum ausmerzt, kann, ob sie es weiß oder nicht, im Herzen nicht gewillt sein, Tyrannei zu bleiben. Vor einigen sechzig Jahren verspottete Nietzsche, ein sehr großer, nur allzu vieldeutiger Denker, die Volksbildung, indem er ausrief: »Will man Sklaven, so ist man ein Narr, wenn man sich Herren erzieht!« Der russische Sozialismus will offenbar keine Sklaven, denn er erzieht sich denkende Menschen. Damit ist er, beinahe unweigerlich, auf dem Wege zur Freiheit.
Thomas Mann in “Thomas Mann Essays - Band 2 Politik” herausgegeben von Hermann Kurzke S. 311ff.


Yeah I suppose. Doesn’t help that I’m actually banned from feddit.org for calling out this countries assistance to genocide so half the g*rmans can’t actually see it.
It’s a marxist history book written by a radical leftist and is very influential in black liberation movements like the black panthers.