Probably makes more sense to kill their dog or something like that. Hint that there’s more where that came from.

Probably related to exposure to stuff in our atmosphere, like most things that spoil out here. Oxygen, water, etc.

Or, do a fun thing, and at the end of it, you get bonus tasty stuff.

But if you’re running anyway…

You could say the same about humans working exploitative jobs. You can be unhappy and still stay because the cost of quitting is too high. It’s only when it gets really bad that it becomes worthwhile.

Edit: I just learned from another comment that they sometimes clip the queen’s wings so they can’t leave.

It does rhyme. The e in second and best are assonant.

The nice thing about having an instance dedicated to porn is that you can just block one instance, and that gets you 90% of the way there.

Thanks, I already got a good explanation from NostraDavid.

Thanks for the explanation. That makes sense.

My problem with these definitions is that my personal computer is also my private computer. […]

This is something I’ve wondered about too. Maybe it should only apply to things that would be too expensive for a single person to own? If everyone can have their own, then it’s personal property, even if you can make money from it.

It does taste like a block of earthy butter. It’s absolutely delicious on its own. Even more delicious if cut into thin slices; that somehow intensifies the flavour.

It sounds like you’re just not into that flavour. It’s not for everyone.

Isn’t private property a necessity for society to function? Even in a communist society where everything is distributed equally, once resources are distributed, those resources become private property.

Or am I misunderstanding the concept of private property?

I’m pretty sure OP is making chili to eat, not for a competition.

The difficulty in training an AI is dependent on data availability. So this is just a question of choosing a language that has the least amount of writing. You can trivially choose any language that doesn’t have a writing system at all and invent a writing system for it. But then you’d also run into the problem of learning the language yourself.

It is not the same thing. When you ask why X is true, you’re not only asking the question. You’re also making the claim that X is true. Since If the premise of the question is wrong, you’re making everyone do extra work to figure out why your question isn’t making sense to them and what question you actually need to have answered.

You can invite speculation without making false claims. You also haven’t contributed anything other than anecdotes despite having made that claim.

Observation is the first step to formulating a theory, which leads to a hypothesis, which can be experimentally tested.

That would be valid if it was what you did. Except it wasn’t. You assumed the hypothesis to be true and asked us why it’s true. You should instead be asking whether or not it’s true.