• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 29th, 2024

help-circle


  • There are plenty of nonprofit organizations that have existed for more than 100 years.

    In fact, I would say there’s a better track record for such organizations than there has been for publicly traded capitalist enterprises, which tend to pop in and out of existence like bubbles by comparison. The only ‘for profit’ enterprises with comparable longevity are businesses that have have been owned by the same family for generations.


  • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I think in English there is also:

    • Comparing the subject to an animal, such as a dog.
    • Slurs for various minorities.
    • Names for ‘vulgar’ body parts, or the act of sex itself.
    • Names for human waste products.
    • Literal ‘curse words’, such as “damn” or “hell”, which imply the subject will go to, or just allude to the existence of, the Christian hell.
    • Literal swears, as in oaths. This is pretty rare in modern English aside from "I swear to god… ". The word “gadzooks” is actually a minced version of “God’s Hooks” (the nails used in the crucifixion), which was probably shortened from “I swear on God’s Hooks”. Its pretty funny how something that was probably deadly serious in the past has been diluted so much that now only cartoon characters say it.
    • Literal profanity, as in invoking the holy in an improper context. This has a lot of overlap with the previous two categories.

    I don’t really know anything about linguistics, but these seem like the categories to me. In addition to the “alludes to the sexual impropriety of the subject (if female) or the subject’s mother (if male)” category.






  • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    21 days ago

    I kinda agree, you are “allowed” to sing or dance or paint just because you want to and not to get good at it, nobody is going to yell at you for that.

    But on the other hand I feel like a large amount of people won’t even try something for fear of being bad at it. I don’t think they explicitly think of it this way but “the only point of doing something is to be good at it” is the implication of that attitude.

    (That’s not to say that you shouldn’t seek to improve your skills if that’s something you enjoy. Just that ‘trying to get better’ isn’t a prerequisite for doing anything at all. You can have fun and enrich your life while sucking at something.)