On that we agree completely. Screaming “N is bad because llm was used to build it” is utter idiocy

Shut the tuck up already, warrior of the idiocy

Blame for different things:

Running around and cursing anyone using llm - that’s an idiotic thing to do, and he is not the one doing it, of course

not the lack of PR skills of a volunteer developer

That’s not what bothers me

But, in the end, he’s a guy making a tool that helps the entire community

While sacrificing his own life (time, energy, emotions, all it takes to keep doing it). That’s not worth it, damn it. Doing something just to say “good luck figuring this out on your own, if it bothers you that much, you stupid fucks” is a priority shift from “what is good for me/project/community” to “what to do with project to stop this toxic shit”. My answer is “Do nothing with the project. Get them to fuck off or get yourself out of their reach”. And my requirement of anyone in charge of anything is clarity

Edit: word “sacrificing” is important. Not sharing out of abundance, not serving out of devotion, but cutting from what he has and needs for the benefit of others

Bullshit. But you are welcome to remain in your bubble, useful idiot that you are

You idiot or brain-damaged? Is OP the person proposing/lobbying the legislation? Read his fucking post yourself, dumbass. He said he’d easily choose the option and asks why it can be a bad thing to do

The guy removed the attribution because he is being harassed

That may be, and he never mentions this in the now famous comment. Or was the message about Lutris being slop a harrasment? (question is genuine, I am somewhere in autistic spectrum)

The ‘fuck you’ move is the people harassing an open source dev

That is not a decent behaviour, no questions. His doing something preemptively in regards to something that he says he doesn’t see as an issue - that’s some bullshit. I am not against him using llm tools, but I am not ok with someone who can’t just say “this is how I am doing things, these are my reasons and they are enough for me, so fuck off (and/or be banned, if GitHub has such a thing)” and instead goes on with some ill-reasoned tyrade. Before anyone brings this up: yes, he also mentions depression, which is no small thing, so demanding crystal-cut reasoning is also bullshit, but that is not my point, the latter being that the guy needs some care, and doesn’t look like he understands that. Which means things are heading towards a disaster, sadly

Well written, but I disagree, because “get out of my backyard”. It is clear as day that the goal of this legislation is not taking care of children, helping parents or anything else worthwhile. So nah, in a well-functioning society this would be immediately put down with “get the fuck out with this hypocrisy” note

Come on, it’s not about tending to a selected group of people, it’s about mandating more surveillance. OP has done nothing to deserve this anger

• You want customisation? Use extensions
• We broke extensions, because
• Also, no API for extensions. Patch our code manually

No integrity in that see I, so drop them I do (Yoda voice)

Made me chuckle)

Been chewing this since yesterday. Okay, here is my two cents:

• yes, what LLM companies are doing is a problem. So dropping anything that has anything to do with their products is a sane way to make a statement
• yes, LLMs can be used effectively in development. Whether Lutris author has been using them well - I don’t know. Guess won’t bother to check either, have other things to do
• yes, doing the stunt with “good luck guessing what is what” is bullshit

Net total, given I’ve already dropped GNOME because of their culture: guess now I am dropping Lutris. Not because of AI per se, but because of “fuck you” move

This. And since we are already in the land of geeks, I’ll find a way to write one if none acceptable exists

Unlikely, sure lol. Once again: I am not giving an llm write acess to prod

Wat. Since when do I need AI to setup infrastructure?

Nah. As a tech people, I am not going to give an llm write access to anything in production, period

Ah, true. I forgot this for a moment

Tell that to apple fans

I never make it to step 1

Yup, I implied rape. Men usually do not worry about getting raped while going home late

Oh, so women do not get raped?