Natanael

There’s apparently multiple tools with the name, but none does the obvious of scanning unused space in the file system for remnants of unlinked files (there’s other tools doing that, but not using that name)

Might also be that fewer are posting about strong disagreements here and mostly have minor ones. Not unlikely when there’s already strong selection effects in who chooses to come here.

Family secret

Probably because they got slashdotted

Try the Archive.org mirror

Not a fan of the marketing speak on that page, as a cryptography nerd there’s a lot of questionable stuff.

SAS authentication is stone cold dead in the LLM age. P2P with friends is trivially trackable by the ISP and can easily map who knows who. ECDSA isn’t “industry leading”, that would be EdDSA or something based on Risetto, or a pq algorithm like ML-DSA

Yes you can cite the other party’s past statements. They might not always mean as much as you hoped for the current court case, unless you can show it was a consistent position of your counterparty even recently, or in particular if they gave you reason to believe that was their position.

“their lawyer said X in one of many arguments in court” is often not that strong

Depends on how repressive.

Often your main method of staying safe is appearing harmless.

You can find dedicated Mastodon and lemmy hosts more receptive to VPN users.

Anonymous use is hard due to stuff like timing attacks and writing style recognition, etc, especially if you post publicly. You want to mimic another style, for example. And create plausible deniability around timings (like say scheduled posts)

But they also think the viruses are engineered to shrink the population, so they should be masking up, but they refuse to, so there’s nothing adequate about it