So to recap: the revolutionary approach isn’t succeeding because it’s under attack by liberals, except the liberal attacks are ineffective as evidenced by an 18% approval rating (nevermind that polling actually shows 34%). Not sure how low approval ratings for liberals is evidence for the efficacy of revolutionaries. Also lowering approval for liberals only empowers the more virulently fascist conservatives.
How, pray tell, does any of that demonstrate the strength of revolutionaries? None of that implies positive support for revolution, or organization necessary to implement that revolution, much less any likelihood of revolution securing the desired end goal.
This approach just seems like toothless reactionary bluster.
People that keep making the same mistakes over and over and calling it progress while never taking responsibility for their failures are in no position to be talking about other people’s failure or successes.
The mistakes of others do not magically make your alternative successful just because it’s different. Success isn’t a feeling of moral superiority, it’s improvements in material conditions. I see no improvement in material conditions.
You can’t claim horoscopes are successful because you think prayer doesn’t work. You need actual measurable results.
So to recap: the revolutionary approach isn’t succeeding because it’s under attack by liberals, except the liberal attacks are ineffective as evidenced by an 18% approval rating (nevermind that polling actually shows 34%). Not sure how low approval ratings for liberals is evidence for the efficacy of revolutionaries. Also lowering approval for liberals only empowers the more virulently fascist conservatives.
How, pray tell, does any of that demonstrate the strength of revolutionaries? None of that implies positive support for revolution, or organization necessary to implement that revolution, much less any likelihood of revolution securing the desired end goal.
This approach just seems like toothless reactionary bluster.
I didn’t say it wasn’t succeeding, I said it’s been stymied by right wing liberals defending the oppression of the working class
This is succeeding? I’d hate to see what failure looks like.
People that keep making the same mistakes over and over and calling it progress while never taking responsibility for their failures are in no position to be talking about other people’s failure or successes.
“Whilst you lack the strength to do away with bourgeois parliaments and every other type of reactionary institution, you must work within them because it is there that you will still find workers who are duped by the priests and stultified by the conditions of rural life; otherwise you risk turning into nothing but windbags.”
The mistakes of others do not magically make your alternative successful just because it’s different. Success isn’t a feeling of moral superiority, it’s improvements in material conditions. I see no improvement in material conditions.
You can’t claim horoscopes are successful because you think prayer doesn’t work. You need actual measurable results.
Surely you are not trying to suggest liberals offer any form of improved martial conditions